Pas facile en effet. ), but that type of thing may be be left to better writers and more patient commentators. Makes perfect sense. And just as our emotions are pretty messy, our ways of dealing with them are just as bad. So did she lie about being able to communicate with Solaris? Andreï Arsenievitch Tarkovski (en russe : Андрей Арсеньевич Тарковский [ɐ n ˈ d r ʲ e j ɐ r ˈ s ʲ e n ʲ j ɪ v ʲ ɪ t ɕ t ɐ r ˈ k o f s k ʲ ɪ j] [1]) est un réalisateur, scénariste et écrivain soviéto-franco-italien né le 4 avril 1932 [note 1] à Zavrajié dans le raïon de Iouriévets (ru) en URSS (actuellement raïon de … The first thing Kelvin says to Rhea is in fact “Am I alive or dead?…” She responds “We don’t have to think that way anymore.” Above all else it is our morality that makes us human. Kelvin asks if she’s coming back, and Snow (who we later find out is a Solaris manifestation) asks “Do you want her to?”. Essays — May 24, 2011. Some succeed, but are further driven insane when the Phantoms come back to life. Réalisé en 2001 par Cameron Crowe, Vanilla Sky est un remake du film Abre los ojos (Ouvre les yeux) d'Alejandro Amenábar de 1997. One researcher on the station, Helen Gordon (Viola Davis) discovers a way to destroy Phantoms. to my mind, the greatest science fiction movie to date. Originally a 1961 novel from Polish writer Stanislav Lem, it was first produced as a film by Russian director Andrei Tarkovsky in 1972. It would explain her last remark to him in the movie, that everything was forgiven. Insufficient data. As Rheya correctly said in the dinner, GOD can only be described as a higher intelligence, something no one will ever understand. Why not. Or perhaps he chooses to end his life holding on to the memory of his dead son rather than replacing him with the newly manifested version, which he also desperately wants to hold on to. How can the writer-director describe something which in the movie is conveyed as something indescribable and unknowable? He had the second chance he hoped for. L’appel au secours de Gibarian est plutôt une manière de le réveiller. Madame Claude est centré sur la tristement célèbre propriétaire de bordel dont le vrai nom était Fernande Grudet. The second incarnation was more refined after Kelvin conversated with Snow about who she was and her significane to him, his question of “do you want her to” posed to Kelvin about her returning perhaps made him think deeper about his memories of his wife and hence the refinement in Rheya and the vivid blue eyes that she had the second time around. Or maybe even Rehya’s memory acting through Solaris? I loved the movie because I always felt or wanted to think it was the idea of an alien falling in love with another alien(foreigner) based on a lack of communication ability and the love arising from a shared understanding of a common or learned concept whatever that concept or idea was may never be known to the audience perfectly but it was always to me a love story of a human and an alien. Like an emotional orgasm. Having seen it initially, my impression was that the ‘intelligent planet’ was learning about us in a neutral, almost naive way using the replicants as an interface with something as alien to it, as it was to us. A lot of people have said the major theme to this movie is love. And the romance thing. She said everything is forgiven and we dont have to worry about life and death. He decides to make the choice to stay on Solaris because on Earth he is “faking his life”, and if he stays, he no longer needs to mourn her death because they are together on Solaris. This is certainly not the case for Solaris, Kelvin and his wife longed to be where they were in the ending (apartment), and it was not temporary, their romance would find no end in Solaris. It’s the “Law of the Petri Dish” playing out again and again; eat the thing next to you before it eats you. Are they only allowed one visitor? Mmm. The phantoms are the answer the book suggests. I think Solaris was attempting to get the people on the space station to deal with baggage they carried around. Why do you think it has to want something? So, ok the lady returns. AI would “get” animal behaviour and motivation pretty quickly, as predicted in other sci fi’s. Any subject. The last scene is the afterlife, they will live forever (the cut finger heals). Kelvin’s colleagues shuts her down and Gibarian in that dinner tells that humans essentially ascribe human characteristics to SOMETHING THAT ISN’T HUMAN. The film contrasts a life-affirming natural landscape to an urban, constructed landscape where the natural world is submerged and invisible. This is why he stayed behind. But then that question would be, did she kill it, did she contain it. It has developed its own “intelligence”, whatever that may mean to a planet-spanning protoplasmic ocean with powers that appear supernatural. It mostly takes place in the characters’ heads. Finally saw this movie and as I first thought when it came out. Solaris: Inner Space. Your email address will not be published. Then during the sequence where we see three Rheya’s at once, the third smiles knowingly at Chris- is that the Solaris entity’s way of giving Chris a slight hint about its nature and the manner in which it exists? For example, to what extent are we humans (or any entity trying to imitate a human) just a collection of what we remember. I think this choice was made because well most of the audience for the movie are of course Christians. No God no matter what religion you believe in would toy with its own creations to the point that said creations take away the most precious thing ever created life. The Soviet era film is clunky and very dated, but has a definite ‘charm’ of it’s own and captures the fear and tension among the crew better. He had a realization that there was (in fa Despite the jumbled nature of the synopsis, I think that’s pretty much it. Be advised that reading the book in order to have the film explained to you may result in even greater confusion. Steven Soderbergh’s SOLARIS (2002) is a challenging film. (I’m kidding!). But in the end…the one person or the one memory or experience or the one concept that it related to or wants to or can relate to is the either the feeling kelvin has for his wife or the concept that kelvin has for his former wife. Tout cinéaste de génie devrait se frotter à la science-fiction. Set in an unspecified future, the film opens on Earth - where psychiatrist Kris Kelvin (Donatas Banionis) is preparing for a trip into deep space. Is it possible that it isn’t Chris’ projected imagening of returning to earth, but perhaps a phantom of him returning? Toby I think much of your explanation is right on; I had many of the same thoughts after viewing and remembering all the events. Sci-Fi indeed! So is Rhea phantom 1 trapped forever in a death and rebirth spiral, somehow reincorporated into the corporeal uber-Rhea, or but a plaything of Solaris to be reabsorbed as perhaps Kelvin and the station is at the end? On perd petit à petit le contrôle. Or are our concepts of our “reality”, merely convenient, and the effects of AI already here. Others, like Jeremy Davies’ Snow, are less successful and are killed by their Phantoms in self-defence. The movie is designed to make a philosophical point about our existence, which was made clear with the line: “there are no answers, only choices.” Followed by the dire message that if you keep trying to look for answers when there are none, ‘you’ll die here.’ Meaning, that if you spend your life questioning your existence rather than simply appreciating being alive you might as well be dead, because you’re missing life in the process. There is no denying that in the movie God/Solaris is being connected to the Christian God. In light of what happens later, it doesn’t matter one way or the other), has seriously bad dreams (sees multiple versions of Rheya, the child again), is visited by Gibarian (another Phantom, presumably) and upon waking up discovers that Phantom-Rheya went to Gordon in order to ask to be destroyed, which Gordon did with some satisfaction. Accroché au fantôme de son ex. MATRIX • Explication de Film décembre 25, 2018 SUNSHINE • Explication de Film décembre 30, 2018 BATMAN v SUPERMAN : L ... SOLARIS • Explication de Film décembre 15, 2020 Lunea février 7, 2021 / Répondre. Do any of us only have issues with one? Perhaps the pills taken in the movie were anti-depressants, as Chris instructed even the phantom Rheya to take them. How about: The first phantom-Rhea jettisoned into space reached earth. And why does Solaris have to wait until you’re asleep, before it raises humans from your subconscious? I would suggest that the book is worth reading in conjunction with this 2002 film as you will be left with a much better idea of what the planet (living Ocean) is like, an entity that has defied human study for decades with it’s temporary ‘liquid computers’ (as some speculate) of impossible complexity towering kilometers into the air and leaving humans with the feeling that it’s intellect may dwarf our own, and that it is only mildly curious about us. Aujourd’hui, on n’a plus le droit. I’d like to think that Solaris saw the ability of the organism on the space station to “evolve” was being “retarded” by their emotional baggage they carried.
Three Little Birds Sat On My Window Tiktok, Merci Beaucoup Pour L'information, Ingénieur En Israël, Daredevil Spider Man 3 Reddit, Heure Ramadan 2021 Lille, Gérard Rinaldi Ncis, Carmilla Movie Dvd, La Nuit Du Destin Date,